What’s meaner than negative campaign ads? Fashion reporting! Here's some dish. Oprah Winfrey, Obama’s earliest superstar supporter, already knows what she'll be wearing to the Inauguration Balls. She bought it last February. And she was so confident of the election's outcome she said, “Last week I said to the stylist, ‘Take it out of the closet. Let’s take it out. Let’s hang it up, and let it air out.”
Another fashion note: What exactly was Michelle Obama wearing on the night of the election. No matter how happy one was with the election's outcome even Obama's supporters must have thought her red and black dress and black cardigan was a little strange. The blog Wonkette dubbed it “hell-colored” and declared the color combination was “Red, the blood of angry men! Black, the dark of ages past!” referencing a rousing battle song from the score of “ Les Miserables.” Another fashion commentator said it looked like a lava lamp.
The dress was designed by Narcisco Rodriguez, who was Carolyn Bessette Kennedy’s favorite designer. It was based on a design from his Spring 2009 fashion show. A bit pricer one assumes than the simple $160 cotton dress in which Michelle appeared on The View or the J Crew outfit she wore on Jay Leno.
She was also bedecked with bling including $10,000 diamond earrings and several diamond bangles. Were they a gift from Oprah? Or from the President-elect ?
Now that Sarah’s back in a parka and on ice for awhile, Michelle will be in the view finder for exactly this kind of analysis from on. Women’s Wear Daily is already reporting that Vogue editor Anna Wintour is trying to get her to pose for the magazine’s cover. Be assured, fashion reporting can be every bit as mean as a negative campaign ad. Maybe even meaner.







Recent Comments